home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / sys / amiga / misc-part1 / 7616 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  2.1 KB
  1. Path: nntp.igs.net!usenet
  2. From: Bob Babbitt <babbitt@igs.net>
  3. Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,alt.sex.anal,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.unixware.misc
  4. Subject: Re: Will anyone buy NT? Wrong newsgroup!!
  5. Date: Sat, 09 Mar 1996 08:35:39 -0800
  6. Organization: IGS - Information Gateway Services
  7. Message-ID: <3141B35A.27DE@igs.net>
  8. References: <4ef48q$rik@news.iag.net> <iLFDxYWClVjE089yn@ibm.net> <4ejvl5$aag@er5.rutgers.edu> <4es2kg$cer@news.ais.net> <quiksilvDM6w33.8LI@netcom.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960203235010.8473B-100000@howard> <4f3aqn$f4u@milo.freenet.vancouver.bc.ca> <3116b1d5.53797777@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <311D75C6.40E0@ix.netcom.com> <poulosioDMzy0J.4zL@netcom.com> <4gat5s$shh@emerald.oz.net> <Dn3LHB.M6C@iquest.net> <Supersede.Dn3sy8.CsG@iquest.net> <312B0660.63F3@mts.se> <4ghi50$2ud@hp01.redwood.nl> <312d0457.98211244@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <4hdsph$hn@cloner3.netcom.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: babbitt.igs.net
  10. Mime-Version: 1.0
  11. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  12. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  13. X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
  14.  
  15. Carl Rohman wrote:
  16. > 
  17. > budbrown@ix.netcom.com (Roland Brown) wrote:
  18. > 
  19. > <snip>
  20. > >Actually, IMHO the OS wars, although seemingly over, could turn into a
  21. > >real WILD horse race if either OS/2 or Win95 had a half-dozen gifted
  22. > >ASM programmers optimizing it for speed and to run like wind on 4
  23. > >megs.  Heck, I remember multi tasking very smoothly on mainframes with
  24. > >64k (note: not 64 megs) back in the 70's.  Of course the architecture
  25. > >was quiet different, but its amazing what a really competent ASM
  26. > >programmer can do.  :-)
  27. > 
  28. > Yes, but writing in Assembler requires a brain.
  29.  
  30. What the hell is this thread doing on 
  31. "news://comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows" not to mention the 
  32. other 15 newsgroups it is posted on.
  33.  
  34. Perhaps it should also be on "news://rec.pets.dogs"
  35.  
  36.  
  37.